Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 05:44

Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Apple Now Selling Refurbished M4 MacBook Air Models - MacRumors
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
If Iran’s Oil Is Cut Off, China Will Pay the Price - WSJ
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
This Common Herb May Hold the Key to Fighting Alzheimer’s, According to a New Study - Food & Wine
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Why are black people harassed more by police officers?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
What is the general opinion of psychologists on Donald Trump's presidency?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Earthworm DNA may challenge everything we know about evolution - Boy Genius Report
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Artificial Intelligence Is Unlocking the Secrets of Black Holes - WIRED